The Transformers Make No Sense

A new Transformers movie is out. Or so I’m told. I won’t be seeing it.

In part, because these movies are noisy garbage where I honestly can’t tell what’s happening because all the giant robots look like grey metal banging into each other and into buildings. I went to see the first movie in 2007 and left having no idea what I’d seen aside from Megan Fox bending over a motorcycle. That I knew I’d seen (unless that was in the trailer for the second movie).

In the cartoon of my youth, where there were robots that were both in disguise and more than meets the eye, I could easily tell who was who. They were distinguished with easily identifiable character traits, voices, sizes, and colors. The 2007 movie was one grey things hitting another grey thing. There were gears and sometimes a splash of yellow.

Also, in the cartoon of my youth, the Autobots held a dance party to “Weird” Al’s song, Dare to be Stupid. So, there is that as well.

But here’s the real issue with the Transformers. Because I liked playing with the toys and watching the 30 minute commercial for more toys disguised as a TV Show (commercials in disguise), it never occurred to me that the TRANSFORMERS MAKE NO SENSE.

Let me point out the obvious, or what should be obvious.

The Transformers, Autobots and Decepicons alike all came to Earth from another planet, Cybertron, where they were possibly created by the Quintessons. The Autobots were the workers, the Decepticons were the military robots. This backstory was never really nailed down and shifted quite a bit. I just put it in here to prove that I went to Wikipedia to look this up before coming here to tell you that Transformers make no sense.

Here’s the part that makes none of it make any sense.

There was never a useful reason for them to transform.

They were all from another planet populated almost entirely by robots that could transform into other types of machines. Why? What benefit is there to being a robot that can transform into another type of machine if every other robot or machine you see can also turn into a robot or another type of machine. That’s only helpful camouflage if most machines don’t turn into robots.

None of the Transformers, while living on their home world, would be in disguise or more than meets the eye. They would be exactly what met the eye, yet another robot that could turn into another robot.

There is zero benefit to this for any of them.

They aren’t fooling anyone.

They’re only in disguise when they land on a planet in the stone age that will eventually have the technology to match the types of machines they turn into. When they landed on earth, they were robots that looked like cars, guns, semi-trucks, cassette decks, and construction equipment. They had to wait until 1985 for those disguises to have any benefit at all, and they’d have to a. really believe that these disguises would pay off eventually, and b. be super patient to wait for that day to come.

Prior to their 1985 awakening on Earth, there was no benefit on Cybertron or on Earth to being a shape-shifting robot.

None.

Why would the Quintessons go to the trouble of creating two different types of shape-shifting robots and then providing them sentience? And if they weren’t created by the Quintessons, but rather gained consciousness from the Creation Matrix or Vector Sigma (see! more proof I looked this up!) what’s the benefit of being able to transform?

There isn’t one.

Aside from 8-12 year old boys in 1985 thinking it was super cool for a car to transform into a robot.

So, there you have it. The Transformers make no sense. Their ability to transform served no purpose on their home planet, and never would as far as any of them knew.

And yet, they transformed.

Now, who’s daring to be stupid!?

 

Rogue One Could Ruin All of Star Wars, So No Pressure

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story opens later this week and I’m excited. And when I’m excited, sometimes I think too much. Which is what happened this morning. I had a thought that about something that could happen in Rogue One that would be simultaneously very, very interesting, and also ruin Episodes IV-VI for all time. And I’m not talking here about how someone remakes Herbie the Love Bug and you claim that it ruined your childhood. This thing could actually ruin the original trilogy.

Now, before I go deeper into my own madness here let me stipulate that the internet is a big place, filled with weirdos, so I’m probably not the first person to have thought of this, but I did not google what I’m about to present here, even after I had this thought, because I wanted to play the string out in my own head first. It was just more fun for me that way.

Now, on to the thing they could do in Rogue One that would be interesting, but also ruin all of Star Wars.

‘Member in Star Wars when Darth Vader had that argument in the board room where he told Admiral Motti, “Don’t be too proud of this technological terror you’ve constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the Force” and then tried to force choke him? ‘member.

Yeah, I ‘member.

The ruination stems from this scene.

In its original context this scene sets up the conflict between religion and technology, faith and science. It shows that Vader not only has magical powers, but that he answers to a higher authority – voiced here by Grand Moff Tarkin.

What it also does is tell us that Darth Vader thinks the Death Star is stupid. He likely questions the expense, in both imperial credits, manpower, and presumably an incredible loss of life (though admittedly this last part is probably of less concern to him). Vader likes technology. He used to be a pod racer. He created a sentient droid capable of lying about his own ability to tell stories and then whether he’s a god or not, as well as suffer severe bouts of anxiety. He was a pilot during the Clone Wars. And is being kept alive by technology. So, to claim that Vader has both an external and existential conflict between faith and technology isn’t much of a stretch.

Knowing that Vader is still fighting with himself and with the other higher ups in Empire about the Death Star after it was completed and fully staffed, why wouldn’t we assume he’d been fighting this same fight through the planning and building stages of the Death Star?

And if he was still mad enough about it to force choke poor old Admiral Motti, couldn’t he have been mad enough to want to sabotage the entire endeavor?

Isn’t it possible that Vader gave the rebels the plans to the Death Star?

And if that’s what happens in Rogue One, it will pretty much ruin Star Wars. It would mean that Leia was never really in danger and she was never really rescued, though it would explain the ease of their escape.

It would also explain why Vader decided to get into his own TIE Fighter and dogfight with the rebels, getting him off the base before it exploded,  killing a bunch of dudes he didn’t like anyway.

It would also give more weight to his dying words, “You already… have, Luke. You were right. You were right about me. Tell your sister… you were right.”

It might make it slightly more tragic that Vader sacrificed himself before his children ever knew the role he’d played in bringing down the Empire.

But, it would destroy the hero’s journey that Luke went on. All that stuff you read about how Star Wars is a mythic quest of good vs. evil, light vs. dark, and the connection between Star Wars and Joseph Campbell’s The Hero with a Thousand Faces would be completely undercut by this piece of information. Go read this. It’s easier than me retyping it.

Also, how strong is the Dark Side if Vader spent his entire existence as Darth Vader trying to undo the damage he did in his turn to the dark side?

It would make all the other evil things Vader did, like all of the people he killed or allowed to be killed both in the Empire and as part of the Rebellion less clear-cut evil and more unnecessary murder done in pursuit of his own aims which were what? Exactly?

When did he know about Luke? Was Leia really a surprise to him in Jedi? Was he trying to help the rebellion and protect his children, or was he just a really terrible coworker who wanted to be right more than anything else, so much so that he’d allow hundreds of thousands of people to be murdered just to prove a point?

And if he’d spent all that time trying to convince the Emperor not to build the Death Star, only to be ignored – which lead him to have it destroyed – and then the Emperor decided to build another one over – what we can only assume were – equally strong objections, doesn’t this call into question his entire relationship with the Emperor?

Could anyone in the Empire really have had any respect for Vader if they knew the Emperor put this little stock in his opinion? And did Vader kill the Emperor to save Luke or because he was tired of being ignored? Was Vader just Milton Waddams and Death Star just his red stapler?

And what about the second Death Star? Did he provide that intel too? And were all those Bothans that died to provide the intel on the second Death Star just murdered to cover Vader’s tracks.

It’s not a boring idea, but it does kind of ruin everything, the symbolism, the motives, the logic, the import of people’s sacrifices, everything.

So, Rogue One, do me a favor and don’t do this, K?

The Leia Myth

Have you seen The Force Awakens yet? You should. One, because it’s pretty great. And Two, because I’m gonna probably spoil some stuff here and if you read on, you may become cross with me for doing so.

Ok. So, we’re agreed that you’re cool with reading anything that follows that may be spoiler-y? Great.

One of the many great things about The Force Awakens is the character of Rey, an orphaned woman surviving on her own as a scavenger on a desert planet who is not only beautiful, but also smart, tough, talented, determined, and a budding bad-assed Jedi.

She doesn’t need to be rescued. And when Finn keeps trying to protect her or save her, she yells at him a bit and then pretty much does it herself.

She’s awesome.

No stranded princess waiting for her Jedi Knight in Storm Trooper armor to come and save her from the bad guys here!

One byproduct of the awesomeness of Rey has become an unspoken (or sometimes actually spoken) agreement about Princess Leia Organa and her role in the original trilogy. And that agreement is this:

Leia didn’t get to do any of the cool stuff, like participate in the destruction of the Death Star. She pretty much just got captured and wore a metal bikini while chained to a giant slug.

This is dopey and wrong-headed.

Here are some of the things she did:

She’s the only person to stand up to Darth Vader without undergoing months of swamp-calisthenics.

She withstood advanced interrogation techniques and still never gave up the location of the hidden rebel base.

She took control of her own rescue, grabbing the blaster from Han, shooting a bunch of Storm Troopers and creating an innovative escape route on the fly.

She saw through their escape, knowing far better than Han did, that they had been let go from the Death Star.

She flew the Falcon while Han and Luke shot the TIE Fighters.

She was in charge of an entire military base, and organized the evacuation, saving hundreds, if not thousands, of lives.

She shot a bunch more Storm Troopers on Hoth while trying to escape with Lando and Chewy.

She executed the plan that got Han unfrozen from carbonite, disguising herself as a bounty hunter and presumably learning an entirely new language to threaten a gangster with a thermal detonator.

While other people used light sabers and blasters to kill the bad guys, she choked a giant slug-monster to death with a chain.

She got to drive the speeder bikes and blast more Storm Troopers. And if we’re being honest, driving the speeder bikes was the one thing we all wanted to do after seeing Return of the Jedi. Those things were awesome.

After getting shot outside the deflector shield bunker, she just gritted her teeth and blasted the hell out of a storm trooper.

Leia was not a passive participant in the events of the original trilogy. And to denigrate her in order to lift up Rey is inaccurate and wrong.

Princess Leia was an inspiration to girls in the 1980s. So much so that my sister-in-law, who doesn’t care at all about Sci-Fi movies, named her dog Leia. And she did this 20 years after Return of the Jedi came out.

So, check your Leia-hating revisionism. It has no place here.

V for Vendetta – R for Ripoff

It’s been months since I have seen the movie, and I didn’t really think of it then, but Alison was watching it tonight and the following thought occurred to me:  I’ll give a shiny quarter to the first person who can convince me that the makers of this film didn’t totally rip the ending off from Caddyshack, short of Natalie Portman not yelling, "Hey, everybody! We’re gonna get laid!"

A 90 minute cautionary tale

On Tuesday I watched Beer League starring Artie Lange who is currently making the Howard Stern show on Sirius must listen radio, and almost, by itself justifies the purchase of Sirius. I didn’t have very high hopes for Beer League as most of Stern’s fans pretty much took a shit on it, but they can be ball breakers of epic proportions and I like Artie, so it was worth the Netflix shot.

The Stern fans are mostly right. It’s not great. It has some funny moments, but on the whole doesn’t get it done. Though I gotta say, the fact that at the end of the movie, the entirely negate the premise of the movie is pretty great.

It’s the story of a fat, drunk Italian from Jersey who is in a slow pitch softball league, against the Italian version of Billy Zabka. Because these two guys, and their teams hate each other and get into a brawl during the first game of the season, the town sheriff basically says, that’s enough you guys fight too much. Only one of you can play in this league next year. So, whoever wins the league stays, the other is banned. The low stakes are appropriate as it’s about all these guys could get themselves up to care about. It’s also funny that an entire movie is built around the idea that it’s worth telling a story where so little is on the line. After all, how hard would it be to play in a different league?

Artie (and here I’m speaking of the character. I gotta respect anyone who pulls the Tony Danza card and plays a character with the same first name, just to make things easier all around) is a big fat slob. He’s a recovering coke addict, who eats too much, drinks too much, and basically has no direction in life. I see no parallels here to the life of Artie Lange, except all of them.

Here’s where it’s hard to watch this movie. Here’s a picture of Artie when he made this movie. He’s not exactly Michael Phelps, but still. Here’s a picture of Artie now. He’s pushing 300 pounds now, and as I watched him run the bases the only thing I could think was, "There’s no way he could even run to first now, much all the way around." It sucks a little bit of the funny out of a movie, when you’re fairly certain the baby gorilla in the starring role is now 100 pounds heavier, and is, in real life, what happens to people who live the way his character in the movie lives. God, it’s sad.

Quick Thought on the Oscars

I missed a good sized chunk of the Oscars last night playing maybe the worst assemblage of people to ever call themselves a basketball team (we won 95-24 and we shouldn’t be that much better than anyone), so I didn’t see the Tenacious Burgundy musical number but I did see a clip of it this morning. And it lead me to this thought.

Every year the Academy hires someone who is supposed to be funny to host the show. This demonstrates that the Academy realizes the importance of comedy. The symbol for theatre is a comedy and a drama mask, not just a drama mask. Why in God’s name is there no recognition for comedy? Some of the greatest movies of all time have been comedies. And some of the greatest performers in the history of film have been comic actors. Just because a movie is funny doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be in the discussion for Best Picture, or that Sacha Baron Cohen didn’t turn in one of the most remarkable performances in any movie this past year.

I know I’m not the first person to bring this up, but not being first does not equal being wrong. Either include comedies in the best picture category or start recognizing them in their own category.

Plus, I for one, would like to see another hour added to the broadcast.

JT

My Prerogative

I was just chatting with Sam and he brought up seeing Pulp Fiction again, and his need to do so. When I first saw this movie I absolutely hated it. I didn’t find it particularly funny, thought it was largely violent for the sake of being violent. I liked it’s non-linear structure, but that was about it. I’ve done a complete 180 on this movie. I wouldn’t say I love it, or even put it on a list of top-whatever, but I do really like it. It got me to to thinking about other movies I completely misjudged the first time around, and for some reason gave another viewing.

1.) Dr. Strangelove: Or how I learned to Stop Worrying and love the Bomb (1964)
        Man, I couldn’t have been more wrong about this one. I chalk this up to youth. I first saw this in high school and I just didn’t get it. I thought it was slow, with a couple of funny moments, but that was about it. This is, without a doubt, one of the 5 best movies ever made. Cold-War satire at the heart of the red scare. It takes balls to make a movie accusing everyone involved in both sides of the arms race of sexual dysfunction when most of the world is busy hiding under their school desks and buying fall out shelters in preparation for the nuclear holocaust.

2.) Raising Arizona (1987)
    When i saw this I thought it was just about the dumbest thing ever. I sat there jaw opened and staring at the absolute idiocy that is H.I. McDunnough. What I know now that I didn’t know then, was that this movie is just about perfect. The entire story, and just about all of the pertinent characters are introduced in the first 10 minutes, and their all done by voice-over, and (and this part you don’t even notice until it happens) all before the opening credits. This also rates very highly on the J. Evans Pritchard scale for what makes a truly great comedy. Y Axis – Holds up to multiptle viewing. X-Axis – Quotability. I can only think of one or tow movies that get a higher overall score than Raising Arizona. BTW, 10 bonus points for correctly identifying Mr. J. Evans Pritchard.

3.) Star Wars Episode i: The Phantom Menace (1999)
    This one goes the other way. I was one of the few people not to completely trash this movie when I first saw it. I was admittedly grading on a curve. I knew that the 20+ years of anticipation had created expectations that no movie could possibly match. I didn’t think it was great, but I thought it was fun and worked well enough. I wasn’t willing to kill it because it didn’t elicit in me the same emotions that the original trilogy did, and still do. But after repeated viewing, this movie is almost unwatchable. Young Anakin is horribly annoying, there are few things as intrinsically dull as trade  disputes. Ben Stein’s delivery about the Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act is exactly as exciting as all trade disputes are, and it serves as the lynch-pin of the whole story. Not to mention the pod-racing, which made for a fun video game, but was about as essential to the plot as, well it just wasn’t very essential to the plot was it? I apologize to anyone I ever disagreed with about this movie. I hope we can still be friends.

That seems like a good place to start. I’d be interested to see other people’s 180s.

Who’s that little old man?

I was just reading Sen. Joe Biden’s comments about Barrack Obama. This whole thing has been completely blown out  of proportion. He was clearly just comparing Obama to Paul’s grandfather.

Of course this implies that Obama is  "A King Mixer" and "Hates Group Unity." I also hear he’s been forging  Senators signatures on their photos to sell on e-bay, pointing out to Joe Leiberman that Ted Kennedy’s always being taller than him just to spite him, and pretending he’s Evan Bayh and taking his invitation to the gambling club.

Still, he’s very clean.

JT

So this is what it feels like, when Doves Cry

Through a promotion from AMC Theaters  Laura and I were able to go see Freedom Writers for free on Friday night. This deal is open to all teachers in the U.S. and Canada, through February 1st. I guess the fear is that if it goes through the 2nd people will be able to see it over and over again.

Anyway, I went into this movie with pretty low expectations. I like Swank, especially as she brings Oscar gold to my Aaron Spelling theory. For those who know not of this theory and it’s undeniable truth, I’ll have to post on that another time. But, I’ve seen this movie where the pretty white teacher saves the urban youth. Sadly, I premenisce, no "Weird" Al song coming from this movie.

It was meant to be an uplifting tale about how a caring and motivated teacher can reach a group of students about whom others have forgotten. And she does reach these students. Over the course of two years the racial and gang lines that divide these students outside the classroom cease to exist inside room 203.

Here’s the problem with this movie. If you’re a teacher, it’s extraordinarily depressing. What I took from this movie is not that one teacher can make a difference. I know that already, I feel I already do, or else I wouldn’t be able to do this job well, nor continue to do it at all. Without giving too much away, and if you don’t want to know more about it than I’ve already written, please go read one of the other wonderfully interesting posts below, in order to reach these kids Mrs. G, has to overcome the resistance of her department chair, the jealousy of her more experienced and tenured colleagues, and a lack of resources.

To do this, she has to, get this, take not one, but two part time jobs during the school year, buy books for her students out of her own pocket. go over the head of her chair and principal to the school board, and oh, yeah, watch her marriage disintegrate and fall apart.

Did you read that last part? In order to do the job that needs to be done to help her students, she has to forfeit her marriage. The message of this movie is, you can help disadvantaged students. You can do truly fantastic things, and help kids as a teacher, if you are willing to take two outside jobs give up your personal life, and lose your marriage. God, that’s awful!

This movie ends up being an indictment of the educational system. And it makes me sad.

On another note, this movie was set in 1994, and I did not see one hi-top fade. I realize they were on the way out by then, but still. Here’s a wonderful list of people who wore high-top fades. At least one of these students should have had one.

Fades not-with-standing it’s a pretty decent movie. Swank does a nice job, and doesn’t end up paralyzed, dead, or dating Steve Sanders so that’s a plus for her. And this teacher she portrays really did do something wonderful for her students and is continuing to try and do wonderful things for other students, so that is also a plus. I just couldn’t shake the sadness I felt at all she had to do just to do her job. I can’t think of many other professions where you have to take two outside jobs just so you can do your primary job well.

JT

Indiana Universe

Pop Culture. Sports. Things.