This is the Grey Album of IU posts

As I abhor the use of the term “perfect storm” to describe every confluence of events that leads to any outcome, I will not try to explain this post as the result of a perfect storm of events. I will say, however, that three games in three days + Thanksgiving travel + parent teacher conferences = hard to write a timely post after each game.

Please accept my apologies, you the teaming masses.

This will be a mash up of thoughts from the St. Joe game and the M. Night Chaminade game.

Only time will tell if this will rise to level of the the Harbaugh Notice, but for the last three games Matt Roth has been compared to Jimmy Chitwood. That’s a completely faulty analogy, by the way. What made Jimmy such a powerful force in Hickory, is when the people were trying to run Coach Dale up the Monan Line Jimmy stepped up and said, “I play. Coach Stays. He goes, I go.” We fired Sampson’s ass and Matt Roth said, “Kelvin Who?”

My hope, heading into Maui, was that we would play hard and be competitive. I knew we’d get beat by Notre Dame, but I had hoped it would be closer than that. I knew very little about St. Joe’s, but I really thought we’d play them closer than that.

In order to hear a story about the last time IU lost two games back to back, by 30+ points, you’d likely have to endure a long and rambling tale where the phrase “He wore an onion on his belt, which was the style at the time. . .” or “We decided to celebrate this sweet event with a big glass of lemon juice, lemons being the sweetest fruit available at the time.”

Phil Martelli looks like smaller version of Peter Boyle.

I like that we don’t have a mascot. Most mascots just stand there, and cheer, maybe dance a bit, but the owl from St. Joe’s kicks ass. Flapping your arms non stop for 2+ hours, three days in a row makes Magnus ver Magnusson look like Woody Allen.

Clearly, we have a lot of problems as a team, but this is what I find encouraging. Most of the things we do poorly can be taught and improved upon.

We don’t close out on three-point shooters at all.

We were right there in that St. Joe’s game until we turned the ball over something like 8 out of 10 possessions in the second half. So, let’s put taking care of the basketball high on the list of things to work on.

We run into each other going for the rebound all the time.

When we drive, stop about six to ten feet out, and either look to pass it, or take the jump shot we’re roughly 14,000x’s more effective than when we push it all the way to the basket. I’d like to suggest drills where the two-foot jump-stop is the focal point.

Speaking of driving, Daniel Moore does a great job of getting into the lane, but prior to the Chaminade game he never looked to shoot. He passes really well, but without the risk of the shot, he’s going to find those passing lanes closed down.

Right now, we are a team full of Derek Colemanesque clutch free throw shooters.

Now comes the silver lining. We played three games, in three games, with little to no chance to practice in between. We now have a lot of information on which to base the next few practices. And the things we don’t do well are fixable, and will undoubtedly improve with practice.

Here is the theme song for the St. Joe’s game, in honor of Phil Martelli.

Here is the theme song for the Chaminade game. It doesn’t have much to do with the game, but it’s the last chance I’ll have to show love to all we love about Hawaii.

What happens when you are really good at “Picture Pages” and are forced to take Calculus?

  • Starting Daniel Moore was a very good decision.
  • We got good shots early and good penetration throughout, but we missed a lot.
  • Jobe played over two minutes before picking up his first foul. That’s a step in the right direction.
  • 8:48 in the first half. Harbaugh alert!
  • I have no doubt that Matt Roth can shoot the ball from eight steps behind the line, but I’m not convinced he needs to try to prove it every time.
  • We drive so hard to the basket and finish completely out of control. If we could just learn to finish soft, we’d be much more competitive.
  • Tom Pritchard has the makings of a great post player. He knows what he wants to do when he catches the ball and does it quickly. That part of his post game reminds me a lot of Kirk Haston. His move isn’t as quick, but he is decisive and effective.
  • Notre Dame passes the ball really well. We spent a ton of time chasing the ball.
  • Playing three games, back-to-back-to-back, against this kind of competition will be extremely valuable for this group of players, if Coach Crean can keep them playing with pride, regardless of the out come of these games.
  • I absolutely loathe the comparison Bilas just made between this team and the post-Sutton Kentucky Wildcats for reasons that number among the stars, not least of which because of its accuracy.
  • Our offense works a lot better when the drive leads to a kick out and a jump shot than when it ends in us throwing the ball off the backboard with roughly the force of a cannon.
  • Way to get on the ground after the loose ball, Devan Dumes!!
  • You know the game is not a going concern when the announcers begin listing basketball coaches who are good golfers.
  • I’m calling, right now, for the hard recruiting push on Cody Zeller.
  • There’s almost nothing I don’t like about the way Tom Pritchard plays. He doesn’t finish consistently, but that will come.
  • Notre Dame is up by 29 and they are running fast breaks and throwing half court alley oops. Screw you guys. I can’t wait until we can take this out on you. It’s going to be a couple of years, but revenge is a dish best served cold.
  • Nick Williams should only be allowed to shoot mid-range jump shots.
  • The best part about this loss is that we get to flip pretty quick and get on to the next game. Having to sit on this for a few days will be harder for this team than getting up tomorrow morning and suiting up against a different opponent.
  • Kelvin Sampson should have jumper cables hooked up to his genitals.
  • Let’s take a moment to think about what we like about Hawaii. Here’s tonight’s theme song.

In your face, Galileo Galilei!

For those of you who are stuck with your the outmoded belief that the Catholic Church is horribly behind the times and culturally stagnant, I present for your approval irrefutable scientific proof that they are, in fact, “with it.”

While it took the Vatican somewhere in the neighborhood of 360 years to change their stance on Galileo’s outrageous stance that the Earth was not the center of the universe, it only took them, or at least their newspaper, 32 years to get over John Lennon’s statement that the Beatles were more popular than Jesus Christ.

[Insert sarcastic applause here]

Award yourself 1000 bonus points if you knew this already

This is the list of career scoring leaders for IU.

1.) Calbert Chaeney
2.) Steve Alford
3.) Don Schlundt
4.) A.J. Guyton
5.) Mike Woodson
6.) Alan Henderson
7.) Damon Bailey
8.) Kent Benson
9.) Eric Anderson
10.) Brian Evans
11.) Scott May
12.) Greg Graham

Do any of these names surprise you? One of the shocked the hell out of me, and it’s all part of what I call “The Strange Case of Old Man Anderson”

I have had this discussion a number of times, but Eric Anderson lives in a strange place in my IU memory. In my mind, he was there FOREVER. Upon much reflection I think the reason it seems he was there for so long is that he bridged two eras. He played with Joe Hillman and Alan Henderson.

The fact that he is number 9 on the all-time scoring list is amazing to me. Just look at who he played with. Numbers 1, 5, 6, and 12 on the list.

He was never the leading scorer in any of his four years. He was second twice, his sophomore and junior seasons, but his freshman year he was third and his senior year he was fifth.

He’s not in the top 50 single game scorers, the top 39 single season scorers, or the top 25 single Big Ten season scorers.

When you think of the 91-93 Hoosiers, I would bet that he is the fifth or sixth name that comes to mind behind Chaeney, Baily, Graham, Henderson, Graham, maybe even behind Reynolds, and Nover (He was in the movies for the love of Mike).

He completely blends in.

Which begs the question. Is Eric Anderson the most underrated Hoosier of all-time?

I can’t think of a single player who was more valuable who get less credit. Is there someone else? If so, please make the argument below.

“A refuge never grows from a chin in the hand and a thoughtful pose.”

Here are my thoughts about the IUPUI game in no particular order.

There is a difference between this team and last year’s team that is nothing short of phenomenal. Last year, we won almost all of our games on the strength of our talent alone. We were just more athletic, faster, better shooters, etc. than most of our opponents. We never figured out how to play to our potential as a team because we relied on our ability more than each other.

This year, every win we get, every improvement we make will be because we earned it. This team works hard. Four games in (counting the mezzanine) we are already more of a team, than last year’s group of guys ever became. For us to win, these guys are going to need to rely on each other and just flat out work their opponents.

I was so excited by almost every aspect of our win last night and it’s because it felt earned.

Our defense in the first half was really good. We held them to 20 points in the first half and a Mike Davis-like 7:00+ minute scoring drought. Our help defense improved over the Northwestern State game.

Our second half devense was less effective, but we held them to 57 points for the game.

Tom Pritchard was all man last night. He had some trouble scoring after the contact at the beginning of the game, but that quickly subsided and he was HUGE.

Our rebounding was better. We still have a room for improvement, but it was better, and we were in a zone for much of the game, which generally makes rebounding more difficult.

Everything about this team makes me feel good. I feel proud again of the type of guys we have and the style of ball we play. We moved without the ball, reversed the ball pretty well, displayed real patience offensively, and realy intensity defensively. I can’t think of a better way to put it. I feel clean this year. It’s great.

Speaking of which, the difference in the post game press conferences from a year ago are equally as pronounced.

The first quote is from Tom Crean last night.

“So to find a way to come back when it was not even close to our best night defensively in the second half, and when certain guys weren’t making as many shots.”

The rest of these are a sampling of quotes from many games by Kelvin Sampson last year.

“I thought we go off to a great start.”

“I thought the second half was really good.”

“I thought from the sixteen minute mark of the second half to the, maybe the two minute mark, I think we were down four and then you look up and we’re up 12. So, we go plus 16 in the second half. I thought we did a lot of good things defensively during that stretch, executed well on offense, spaced it, just played a lot better that second half.”

“Our last three minutes we had no turnovers, missed no free throws and they had no offensive rebounds”

“I thought we corrected a lot of those from the first half to the second half. We were better in the second half.”

“Once we got to half time, I thought we were good.”

“Probably as good as we’ve played all year, the second half.”

“We’re good defensively when we need to be.”

Do you notice a difference? I do. Crean, in his first comment after the game acknowledged that we did not play very well defensively in the second half. Sampson spent almost all of last year down playing out weaknesses and trying to make people focus on the parts of the game we played well. PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!!!

That may seem like a small distinction, but I’m telling you it’s huge. The first is the perspective of someone who is proud of his team for overcoming their shortcomings. The second is the perspective of someone who wants everyone to ignore the bad things and only see the good.

Daniel Moore is a stud. He played 23 minutes, and didn’t score until those free throws at the end of the game, and he got to the line because at 5’9″, he pulled down a crucial rebound. He finds the open man and delivers the ball well. If he was five inches taller, he’d be scary good.

We had a one point lead with :20 seconds to play and the best shot IUPUI could get was a long and contested three. That was a great defensive possession.

Win or lose this season, if we play with the kind of heart and toughness with which we played last night’s game, I am going to really enjoy watching this team play.*

*Remind me of this when we hit a losing streak and I want to take a shit on everything.

Oh, and finally, here’s the theme song to tonight’s game.

“The beginnings and endings of all human undertakings are untidy.”

Comparing Daniel Moore to Erik Suhr is an undersell. He reminds me much more or Tom Coverdale. He’s not as big, but he has the same sneaky speed and deliberate, but effective, dribble moves. He also walks with that same swagger that Coverdale had.

We got a lot of help from Northwestern State. They made more unforced turnovers than we’ve ever going to see again.

We’re not a good rebounding team. Yet.

I am going to be nervous a lot this year. I can’t count high enough to give you an accurate assessment of how many times I inhaled sharply in what I can only describe as “the same way I reacted whenever Todd Lindeman dribbled.”

We have more hustle than smarts right now. When we play as smart as we do hard we’re going to be a very solid team.

I was impressed with the play of both Jones and Dumes. Aside from youth, the biggest knock on Jones is that he’s so skinny Bluto and Popeye would fight for his affections.

Jobe’s footwork has me in constant fear that someone is going to emergency.

Devan Dumes gets his hair cut by Jamal Meeks, or so I assume.

I’m going to put the over/under for Harbaugh mentions this season at 1500.

Why is there an ad for WNIT on the floor? That’s just awful.

I did not hear four syllables, five claps once tonight. I’m proud of you guys.

And finally, the theme song for this game. Listen at your on risk. This song is pretty bad. Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty, bad.

“I just floated to the surface and said to myself, `it’s wet’. If you know what I mean.”

I got this article from my mom this morning and I was very excited that I wasn’t being asked to forward something to ten friends.

She sent it to me because one of the IU fans quoted in the article is someone she was worked with for years.

The part of the article that interested me, interested me enough to write about IU football, when I have yet to write about our first basketball game, was this:

He said the current Hoosier team doesn’t have former coach Terry Hoeppner’s ability to motivate and draw excitement from fans.

“He just goaded you into unbiased enthusiasm,” Brad Snyder said. “I mean, you just wanted to believe you were going to win, because he had magic about him.”

To my mind, that is the crux of the issue.

Under Hep, I was excited about our chances every game we played. He came in with such enthusiasm that he swept all of us up in it. So fierce was his passion that it extended after his death.

Bill Lynch is Eeyore to Terry Hoeppner’s Tigger.

Terry Hoeppner bounded into the room singing a song praising everything about IU football. And you wanted to join in on the song. Sadly, he bounded out of the room and into the clearing at the end of the path far too soon.

Bill Lynch does not inspire that reaction. He is someone you check in with every now and again to see if his house has fallen down or his tail has come off.

It’s not that Lynch is a bad coach, though based on his career record of 12 wins and 45,000 losses that argument does have some legs.

He has no cult of personality and, sadly, you can’t fake that.

On the plus side, he’s also no Glamour  Boy.

“By the way, I’m aware of the irony. . .

of appearing on TV in order to decry it. So don’t bother pointing it out”

Friends, I want to talk to you about predictions, punduntry. Preposterous!

I have read over and over again how IU is going to finish last in the Big Ten and be lucky to win 10 games. These predictions are based, largely on no available data.

The logic goes something like this.

Given: Indiana has only one returning scholarship athlete from last year. They have a team made up of freshmen, walk-ons and two JuCo transfers. They only have three players over 6’6″.

Conclusion: They are going to be awful.

Here’s my problem with that logic, it’s missing a crucial middle step. There is no previous data on which to base that conclusion. There has never been a team constructed in this manner. It’s very much like Dana Barrett’s apartment that way. Nobody EVER made them like this.

So, based on no observable data (many of these predictions came before anyone saw this team play at all) you have concluded this will be the worst team in the Big Ten and struggle to win 10 games.

I cry shenanigans!

While I will admit there is no reason to pick this team to win the Big Ten, there’s also little reason to pick them to finish in the cellar.

We lack size and experience. But there are a lot of teams with both size and experience that are terrible, so that can’t be your entire argument, can it?

We have kids who can shoot. We have kids who can handle the ball. Anyone can play defense if they want to and are taught how.

We have kids who want to be here. Kids who wanted so badly to be Hoosiers that the decided to come despite everything that has happened over the last two years and the uncertainty that lies ahead. That is dedication. That is heart.

If you have kids who can shoot and handle the ball, who are dedicated and willing to work all you need is a good coach to make them competitive.

We’ve certainly got that.

I know we’ve been told to keep our expectations low this year, and I think that’s wise. It’s always better to be pleasantly surprised that horribly disappointed. But I just can’t believe we’re going to be as bad as everyone says we’re going to be.

Maybe I’m Dr. Pangloss, but I just don’t think so. Who honestly thinks it’s going to be harder to watch this team play than it was to watch Mike Davis’ team stand around and watch Bracey Wright dribble and shoot our way to a losing record?

The worst is behind us. There’s nothing to do but celebrate this team. Even if they only win 10 games (which I don’t. I think we’re going to be much closer to .500 than anyone is willing to say) they are going to be competitive. They are going to improve. They are going to work.

This will be a better brand of basketball than we’ve seen in quite a while. And I’m making my prediction (which I’ve just finished telling you is a preposterous thing to do, cause who am I Kreskin?) that we’re going to be battling to start our Big Ten Tournament on Friday, and may well be playing in the NIT.

I don’t think it means, what you think it means

I was helping some students with math after school today. It may be more accurate to say that I was watching someone else help students with math after school today, but I was being very supportive, so I think that was helpful.

The problem was something like 10¹/10³.

She was encourage to write the exponents out as follows 1-3= ?. She was resisting this suggestion, so we wrote it out for her. As we were writing it she “Oh, -2.”

“See, you are a visual learner.”

“I know,” she said. “I watched Kelly show me the answer.”

The Rock says

The redheaded step children of the state of Indiana have their panties in a bunch, once again.

The continual bitching about lack of respect, lack of coverage, etc. has begun by our friends from West Lafayette.

“IU’s going to suck this year. Purdue is favored to win the Big Ten. Matt Painter has done a fantastic job. Indiana fans just want to live in the past. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.”

I would like to address these various complaints one at a time.

1.) IU’s gonna suck this year.

Check back later for a longer argument as to why this isn’t accurate. The short version is we’re young, sure, but we’re committed, motivated and have a terrific coach. Not entirely unlike Purdue last year.

2.) Yes, they are. And they should be. Enjoy this season. You’ve got a great group of players.

3.) Yes, he has. Purdue did a fantatic job transitioning from Gene Keady to Matt Painter, and it takes a man to do that. (50 bonus points if you know to what that references.) Matt Painter coaches a great style of basketball. I’m a Hoosier, but I find it hard to hate a program that is doing things the way Purdue is doing them. Good for you guys.

4.) Three thousand years of beautiful tradition, from Moses to Sandy Koufax, you’re goddamn right I’m living in the past! Walter Sobchak was right.

Recent events excluded, the history of Indiana basketball is fantastic and worth embracing. Which is something I will be doing frequently here.

So, Purdue fans, I’m sorry that you don’t feel like you get the respect that you deserve. You’ve got a great team this year, one that should be fun to watch.

And I’m sorry if this hurts your feelings, but you are not IU basketball. You are not going to magically become IU basketball just because we hired a jack ass two years ago and you have a good team.

So, The Rock says this, KNOW YOUR ROLE AND SHUT YOUR MOUTH!!

Indiana Universe

Pop Culture. Sports. Things.